6th July 2005, 16:46
<br><i>(Originally posted on The Judgment of Paris Forum, March 27th, 2004.)</i><p>The poet tells us that <i>"beauty is truth, truth beauty,"</i> and while we may wish to reserve a discussion of the deeper implications of Keats's insight for another occasion, the plus-size industry would do well to adopt this mantra as a guide in creating size-positive campaigns.<p>Lane Bryant has just released a new "magalog" which testifies to the progress that this company has made over the past few seasons in embracing full-figured femininity. Perhaps the models are still not as curvaceous as the public would like, but not only are they larger than they once were, but Lane Bryant's entire approach to presenting plus-size beauty has undergone a radical rethink, and is now more in tune with the progressive spirit that we see at companies such as Torrid and Reitmans<p>Consider this lingerie image of Maiysha. According to some outdated notions about promoting plus-size fashion (outdated, but still regrettably operative in some circles), this photograph would require airbrushing to remove any so-called "flaws," such as a roll around the midriff. But Maiysha's spring/summer campaign for Lane Bryant deserves acclaim precisely because the company has <i>not</i> resorted to this approach, but rather, has presented her natural figure without any embarrassment.<p><center><img src="http://www.judgmentofparis.com/forum/maiysha02.jpg"></center><p>As Penningtons demonstrated with its current lingerie promotion featuring Jeanna Lynn, which accentuates rather than minimizes her full thighs, an image such as this--which combines beauty <i>and</i> truth--can compel viewers to reconsider their lifelong aesthetic indoctrination. What in the world makes a roll around the midriff a "flaw," anyway? Rather than detracting from the model's beauty, her perfectly normal silhouette <i>contributes</i> to that beauty.<p>Just as someone once said of Marilyn Monroe <i>("She had curves in places where other women don't even have places"),</i> full-figured models have curves in the same places that most women <i>do</i> "have places." What could make anything think that these natural features are not beautiful? (What, other than a century of aesthetic brainwashing . . . )<p>In the same spirit, here is a glimpse of Kaila, a model who recently signed with the Big Gals agency in Australia. Kaila has just shot a bikini spread for an Australian magazine, which strikes us as something of a breakthrough. As we see in the test images on her comp card (which can by enlarged by clicking on the following image),<p><center><a href="http://www.judgmentofparis.com/forum/kaila01.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.judgmentofparis.com/forum/kaila01t.jpg" border="0"></a></center><p>the model has a soft, rounded stomach--not at all like the typical <i>Sports Illustrated</i> waif. And again, one must ask--how in the world could anyone consider this feature a "flaw" of any kind? If one browses through the millennia-long artistic legacy of the West, one is hard pressed to find an image of a woman who <i>does</i> have flat stomach, and who does <i>not</i> have a <i>"womanly tummy"</i> (to use Mia Tyler's phrase).<p>It staggers the imagination to consider just how much healthier our society would be, if the images of women that surrounded us every day were beautiful and truthful, like these photographs of Maiysha and Kaila, rather than artificially emaciated.<p>This is one of the principle reasons why we have always rejected the outdated notion that plus-size models need to be "toned," or have "flat stomachs," or any of the other supposed "rules" about plus-size modelling that arose because the industry applied straight-size standards to the full-figure category. Not only should plus-size models <i>not</i> be bound by those rules, but in fact, they should be at the forefront of the movement to reject those rules as unnatural, and to produce images of women that are both truthful . . . and beautiful.