Curves aid fertility; thinness an impediment
In another example of medical research overturning diet-starvation propaganda and reaffirming the healthiness of the fuller female figure, an eye-opening new article at the Daily Mail confirms that plus-size women (those who are "over"weight and yes, also those who are supposedly "ob***") are naturally fertile and can produce healthy babies, while underweight women tend towards infertility and starve their own embryos.
Here are some highlights:
The difference in fertility between the plus-size women and the emaciated women is stunning. How ironic that the article still applies the adjective "dangerously" to curvy women, when, as this study shows, it is in fact being THIN that is dangerous to health. Being full-figured is actually healthy and beneficial:
A devastating study posted on the forum last year showed that being androgynously thin renders women infertile because it kills their estrogen. But shockingly, this new study shows that even if this hormone deficiency is artificially treated, underweight women still tend to be barren, whereas plus-size women are naturally fertile.
So not only do women who subject themselves to exercise-torture often starve their own daughters (if they even have children) once those children are born, but, as this study shows, women who diet even starve their own embryos. It's truly horrifying.
The doctor who organized this study comments on the sociological background behind this alarming situation:
Once and for all, the media, and the medical field, must stop irresponsibly creating so-called weight "epidemics" out of whole cloth and pretending that being plus-size is unhealthy, when in fact, study after study shows that being full-figured is far healthier for women in every way. Furthermore, it must start reporting on the fact that being thin is the truly unhealthy condition for women, and that diet-starvation is dangerous and even life-threatening.
Re: Curves aid fertility; thinness an impediment
In perusing the above story, I came upon a vital follow-up article at the Daily Mail published just a day after the previous piece. It's by Liz Jones, who has written excellent articles condemning the fashion industry for its pro-anorexia criminality.
In it, the author observes that
She reaffirms the point about self-imposed starvation causing barrenness:
The article then turns heartbreaking in that the author tells her own story. She describes how anorexia deprived her of motherhood:
"If only I'd eaten." It would be tragic enough in the case of a woman who had been starved due to poverty. But the idea that women in the West do this to themselves, voluntarily, is maddening and pitiable.
However, in a moment of amazing honesty that all diet-obsessed women should take to heart, the author admits that had she given birth while being in this thin-obsessed state, the consequences for her daughter would have been terrible:
All too many young girls suffer exactly this fate.
The final passage of the article is an anecdote that is heart-rending, but must be read in full:
I almost cried when I read about this poor young girl, whose "chubbiness" is undoubtedly natural and normal. Not only is she deprived of the food that she obviously craves (clearly she's already being starved by her "parents"), but she is even being stigmatized for drinking orange juice. And the fact that she is being brought up by two men with a hardwired antipathy to the female form lends the situation a particular horror, because we all know how such men treat the adolescent fashion models whom they employ -- forcing these young girls to starve away any trace of femininity. The prospect of having this pair subjecting this young girl, ostensibly their daughter, to such starvation, even when she is merely a child, is grotesque.
Every single thing about that picture is wrong. The circumstance that Liz Jones describes should never exist, and no young girl should ever be in such an unnatural, corrosive situation.
Re: Curves aid fertility; thinness an impediment
There is so much sadness in this thread that is breaks the heart. But it relays important information that everyone should apprehend.
The idea that any parents could put their own daughters on diets, depriving them of the food that their growing bodies require, is monstrous and unnatural. The most basic responsibility of motherhood is to nourish their young, something that they should do gladly and with joy. In Old World cultures, wives and mothers are happiest when they provide bountiful food for their families, the tables groaning with provender. But modern society has severed this traditional impulse of motherhood, brainwashing women into hating their naturally full-figured appearance, resenting their innately generous appetites, and sentencing themselves to a starvation regimen. For women to abuse themselves this way is bad enough, but to pass on such a self-destructive body hatred to their own daughters is sheer cruelty. It is like passing on a genetic disorder. Mothers should protect their daughters from the curve-o-phobic pressures of modern society, not betray their young to the agenda of diet corporations.
But to learn that when women willingly malnourish themselves (simply to conform to the fashion industry's emaciated standard), they starve their own embryos, thus harming their future offspring in the womb, when they are most helpless and vulnerable, represents a new degree of horror.
Who knows what damage this wilful starvation does to the embryos? Who knows what the consequences of such needless malnourishment might be? Does it diminish brain capacity? Does it hobble the future physical condition of the body? In starving herself to conform to the media's toxic standards, a woman might well be endangering her children's lives, even while they're still in the womb, putting her offspring at physical or mental risk, potentially burdening them with lifelong physiological disadvantages.
The most savage irony in this is that the rationalization that parents who inflict body-shame on their daughters commonly use to justify their pitiless actions is that they are trying to "improve their lives," because being plus-size is supposedly burthensome. (How absurd, even malicious.) But consider, according to such a rationale, how much worse the consequences of malnourishing the embryos in the womb might be, for the long-term health and well-being of a woman's offspring. She could first, while pregnant, be circumscribing her daughter's future mental capacities or physical condition, and then, once she is born, inflict psychological punishment on her daughter by stigmatizing her about her weight.
It is a long, tragic litany of horror, and it all begins with a woman's inability to appreciate the beauty of the fuller female figure. And such warped thinking is a direct consequence of the toxic visual culture that the fashion industry and the mass media are allowed to inflict on society.
With such a grim array of consequences, there is no way that any organ of the media should be allowed to valorize a look of cadaverous emaciation, an inhuman standard that literally ruins the lives of women of every age, from generation to generation.
In the article that Shelley linked, the young girl's fate is truly pitiable, a misfortune compounded by the fact that she being brought up in an environment that is inimical to begin with. As Shelley points out:
Such considerations of essential aesthetic attitudes should be taken into account at the adoption stage. Just think: the girl might have grown up in a normal environment with a caring mother and father, who raised her self-esteem instead of undermining it, who allowed her to eat whatever she liked and thus develop a comfortable relationship with food, instead of saddling her with an eating disorder in the making.
A common thread linking the most gorgeous and popular plus-size models (Sophie Sheppard, Kelsey Olson, Katherine Roll, etc.) is that they all grew up in traditional, loving, supportive family environments, with parents who taught them to adore their curves and never expressed negativity about their full-figured appearance.
Hopefully, the images that these goddesses create can help foster a world in which all girls and young women grow up in similarly favourable circumstances, with mothers who have realized that plus-size beauty is true beauty, and who pass along this body love to their daughters.
Gorgeous plus-size model Katherine Roll (size 18) epitomizing curve-adoration, for Pink Shoppe:
|All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:01.|
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.