The Judgment of Paris Forum

Go Back   The Judgment of Paris Forum > 2005-2012 > 2011: January - December
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 26th August 2011   #1
HSG
Administrator
 
Join Date: July 2005
Posts: 1,784
Default Consider the source


We initially deemed out recent thread about the TV series The Romantic Spirit an "off-topic" post. However, it now occurs to us that the theme is actually quite germane to the subject of this forum. Romanticism constitutes a bold rejection of cultural hegemony, a defiance of the corrupt powers-that-be, and an uncompromising adherence to truth and honour. If there were more Romantics in the fashion industry, plus-size beauty would be in a better position than it is today.

Here's why.

* * *

The founding work of the Romantic movement was Johann Wolfgang von Goethe's drama Götz von Berlichingen (1773). This play chronicles the life of a famous nobleman of the Middle Ages, one of the last Free Knights of Germany, an indomitable hero who defied the corrupt and tyrannical forces that established a stranglehold on central Europe in the 16th century.

After losing his right arm to enemy cannon-fire in a fearsome battle, Berlichingen had a Nürnberg metalworker fashion an iron appendage for him as a replacement. Götz's iron hand became his symbol and a part of his legend.

This page features a number of choice excerpts from Goethe's play, as well as pictures of Götz's actual iron hand (photographed by yours truly), which remains on display in the Berlichingen castle.

We mention all of this because Goethe's drama sheds light on a current controversy that is raging in the plus-size community.

In Goethe's play, Berlichingen finds himself under attack by the forces of Adelbert von Weislingen, a fallen knight who was a boyhood friend of Götz, but who has since become a pawn of the corrupt establishment.

The indomitable Berlichingen triumphs over the cowardly Weislingen, yet treats his defeated foe with knightly courtesy, and attempts to revive their past friendship. Weislingen even becomes enamoured of Berlichingen's sister, Maria, and the pair are soon betrothed.

However, when the weak-willed Weislingen finds his way back to court, he betrays Berlichingen and abandons Maria--an act of supreme dishonour.

Götz is devastated by this treachery. He cannot believe that Weislingen could behave so contemptibly, particularly towards his virtuous sister. But Götz's loyal ally, the great knight Franz von Sickingen--a champion of the Reformation and a friend of Martin Luther--puts the matter into perspective:

Quote:
GÖTZ: During his captivity Weislingen won Maria's love, sued for her hand, and I promised her to him.

SICKINGEN: Is this true?

GÖTZ: As I say.

SICKINGEN: He broke a double bond. It's well for you that you did not become related any closer with the traitor.

GÖTZ: She sits there, the poor girl, grieving and praying her life away.

SICKINGEN: We'll make her sing.

GÖTZ: What? Can you make up your mind to marry a girl that has been deserted?

SICKINGEN: It is an honour for both of you to be betrayed by him. Don't you think I'm capable of driving away the shadow of a scoundrel? Let's go and see her.

There speaks the voice of Romanticism. In his line, "It is an honour for both of you to be betrayed by him," Sickingen delivers a message that is as timely for us today as it was in Goethe's era.

Because Weislingen is a corrupt swine, anything that he hates must, by definition, be noble, and anything that he admires must be contemptible.

As a noble soul, Berlichingen should take pride in the fact that such a villain is his enemy. By contrast, if the debased Weislingen approved of Götz, it would actually be a black mark on Berlichingen's name, given Weislingen's baseness.

In effect, what Sickingen is saying is, "Consider the source." An insult from a bad man is a badge of honour. Antagonism coming from a contemptible individual is a blessing, not a curse, while praise from such a source would actually be degrading.

* * *

The above scenario helpfully illuminates the current relationship of plus-size beauty to the thin-supremacist fashion establishment, and particularly to the cabal of weight-bigoted fashion writers who prop up the industry's curve-o-phobic status quo.

The minus-size fashion industry is (like Weislingen in Goethe's play) a toxic entity, a destructive force. It promotes anorexia. It triggers eating disorders. It sanctions (even glorifies) drug abuse. It ruins the body image of women around the world. In its current, unreconstructed form, it is a blight on society.

Therefore, to attract disapproval from such an odious entity is a badge of honour, a mark of distinction.

If, say, an anti-plus "mainstream" fashion writer in Australia slams a plus-size model, or a group of plus-size models, then those models should feel proud of this fact and take it as a measure of their great worth, because it means that they are threatening the fashion world's pernicious status quo.

The more that someone in today's straight-size fashion establishment condemns an individual who embodies plus-size beauty (for being supposedly "over"weight), the better and more significant that attacked individual must be.

By contrast, given that the fashion elites have such warped, degenerate aesthetic preferences and glorify corpse-like emaciation, anything that they sanction is undoubtedly harmful. Whatever earns their approval is part of the problem, not the solution, because it bolsters the androgynous aesthetic rather than challenging it. To win the acceptance of the anorexia peddlers, a plus-size model must be so faux-plus, so thin, as to constitute no threat to the status quo. And that status quo fosters eating disorders, curve-o-phobia, and anti-plus hatred.

Thus, if a plus-size model does not outrage the current powers-that-be, then she is clearly too thin to advance the cause of size celebration. If the weight-bigoted fashion elites accept her, then she is plus-size in name only, and her work does nothing to bring about the acceptance of visibly larger bodies.

Rather, the finest, most subversive, and most significant plus-size models must, by definition, be those whom establishment fashion writers hate, who make them see red, who have them reaching for their smelling salts and resorting to playing the "health" card--an act of glaring hypocrisy that doesn't pass the laugh test, given the frighteningly malnourished condition of "regular" fashion models.

(Any attempt to claim that frail, starving, chain-smoking anorexics are somehow "healthier" that well-fed, robust size 18s, 20s, 22s, and up, is patently ridiculous, virulently offensive, and above all, a bald-faced lie.)

But clearly, such hysterical appeals to "health" coming from a fashion establishment that is nothing but a pro-anorexia racket indicates that these models--these truly full-figured plus-size models, who are condemned by the fashion elites--are the ones who really matter. These genuinely full-figured models are shattering the hegemony of skinniness. They are undermining the fashion industry's tired propaganda that "thin=beautiful," that "clothes look better on walking cadavers," and all of the other falsehoods that the anti-plus bigots utter to prop up the starvation standard and suppress the return of the curvaceous ideal.

Such fanatical reactions from the anorexia peddlers indicate that full-figured fashion is on the right track. If anything, the industry needs models who will outrage the weight bigots even more: gorgeous models size 18, 20, 22 and up, whose sumptuous beauty will have the fey fashion elites wailing and whining as their empire of emaciation crumbles all around them.

The androgyny-worshippers' laughably hypocritical attempt to reference "health" (when the cadaverous standard that they promote is debilitating, and frequently fatal) shows that they are getting nervous. Their aesthetic monopoly is under threat. Now is the time to keep the pressure on them, and soon, their whole crooked establishment will collapse into its own rotten foundations.

Remember: it is an honour to be attacked by the thin supremacists; it is a distinction to be hated by the weight bigots; because these monsters are championing a poisonous aesthetic that destroys women's body image, fuels limitless misery worldwide, and leads to eating disorders in both the models themselves and in the millions of girls around the world who tragically follow their lead.

The models who earn their ire are champions of body freedom and truly subversive embodiments of full-figured femininity, and if there is going to be an aesthetic restoration, it will be because of their courage and beauty.

The sumptuous allure of size-28 goddess Rosie Mercado. Observe the soft fullness at the model's arm and shoulder, part of the overall opulence of the image.

Click to enlarge

- Click to view larger

HSG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2011   #2
Meredith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 2010
Posts: 188
Default Re: Consider the source

Quote:
Originally Posted by HSG
Any attempt to claim that frail, starving, chain-smoking anorexics are somehow "healthier" that well-fed, robust size 18s, 20s, 22s, and up, is patently ridiculous, virulently offensive, and above all, a bald-faced lie.

Quoted for truth. The unmitigated gall of any apologist for the minus-size fashion industry trying to fly the "health" flag would be laughable if it weren't so obscene.

Straight-size models have died -- literally died -- due to starving themselves into the fashion world's inhuman sample size, and the thin supremacists who push this look are suddenly talking about "health"? The hypocrisy is sickening.

If anyone in the fashion establishment had any actual concern about "health," they'd make sure that every government in the world banned all current straight-size models, because they're all underweight, every last one of them, and they all display a malnourished body type that triggers eating disorders.

I refuse to believe that anyone could be so stupid as to believe that these waif-worshippers actually care a whit about "health." If they did, the fashion world wouldn't be a pro-anorexia industry, which it is. They're just slickly using this as a propaganda tool to try to keep the anorexic monopoly in place.

And that's what's so offensive about the whole situation -- that these curve-o-phobes have so completely brainwashed the media that a literally emaciated appearance -- the very opposite of actual health -- has been falsely passed off as the semblance of heath.

It would be like making the look of a tuberculosis patient or a cancer victim the benchmark of what people consider a "healthy" look! It's madness.
Meredith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th August 2011   #3
Kaitlynn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 2005
Posts: 633
Default Re: Consider the source

Here's a vignette that puts the whole Australia debacle into perspective.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/fashion-w...jectid=10747861

Predictably, it's a mixed-message article, but here's the pertinent point:

Quote:
A waif-like model almost collapsed from lack of food and water at NZ Fashion Week, a designer says.

Plus-size designer Caroline Marr said she had to come to the aid of the tiny model who was close to collapse at last year's event.

"Some of them are very skinny. I've had to feed girls out the back," said Marr, founder of The Carpenter's Daughter clothing label. The label has six boutiques around New Zealand and has twice shown at NZ Fashion Week.

"If someone thinks a size 16 or 18 is ob*** they need to correct their eyesight."

Marr said the only unhealthy models she had seen at NZ Fashion Week were under-weight, not "over"weight, like the model who had gone through the day without eating...

The fashion establishment mandates an emaciated look that puts the lives of its models at risk, and it has the gall to talk about "health"? It's beyond repugnant; it's actually criminal, because it brainwashes women into trading a genuinely healthy, full-figured, natural state, at a size 18, for a life-threatening minus size.
Kaitlynn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th August 2011   #4
Tanya
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 2011
Posts: 105
Default Re: Consider the source

I love the premise of this article. The hostility of beauty's enemies to full-figured femininity is as great a tribute to its merit as is the approval of beauty's allies. I wholeheartedly concur.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HSG
To win the acceptance of the anorexia peddlers, a plus-size model must be so faux-plus, so thin, as to constitute no threat to the status quo. And that status quo fosters eating disorders, curve-o-phobia, and anti-plus hatred.

Thus, if a plus-size model does not outrage the current powers-that-be, then she is clearly too thin to advance the cause of size celebration. If the weight-bigoted fashion elites accept her, then she is plus-size in name only, and her work does nothing to bring about the acceptance of visibly larger bodies.

Regrettably, this is true. In fact, the presence of faux-plus models might even unintentionally undermine the benefits of featuring true plus-size models. How? Because when the anti-plus bigots see a plus-size fashion show where thin, faux-plus models walk alongside genuinely full-figured models, those anti-plus propagandists can glom onto the faux-plus girls and use them as a stick to beat the actual plus-size models. They can create a binary where they deem the non-plus-looking faux-plus models the "good" models (as anyone who hates plus-size beauty typically would), and call the actually full-figured goddesses the "wrong" kind of models.

In this way, the faux-plus models become a tool of the establishment, one that is used to keep the skinny ideal in place, to maintain the pernicious myth that thinner=better, and to undermine and delegitimize the visibly full-figured models who really are a challenge to the status quo.

That's why shows like FFFWeek and FWPS have it right. Instead of mixing faux-plus models with plus-size models, they maintain a rule whereby the models all have to be above a size 14 at least. Then there are no size comparisons that the media can rig against the curvier girls, because all of models in the show are visibly full-figured goddesses.
Tanya is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:22.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.