The Judgment of Paris Forum

Go Back   The Judgment of Paris Forum > 2005-2012 > 2010: January - December
User Name
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 13th January 2010   #1
M. Lopez
Senior Member
Join Date: August 2005
Posts: 587
Default Quote in Crystal Renn NYT article

There's a new article about Crystal Renn in the New York Times. It's the familiar story to everyone who's been following the news over the past few years, and I kind of wish a paper like the Times had discovered a fresh angle.

However, the one quote that struck me as extremely important was this one - and as usual, not for any reason that they writer seems to recognize:

THE rub is that many plus-size models complain that their images are often retouched as routinely as celebrity covers only to make them look bigger. Ms. Renn said that she had seen images in which weight was added to make her appear to be a size 20, to be more appealing to larger customers.

(An aside: I have never seen Crystal look anywhere remotely near a size 20. I wish. The closest ever has been her Australian Harper's Bazaar editorial, where she looked like a true size 14.)

But that's not the important point. What is important is the part that I underlined - that plus-size models' sizes are artificially increased "to be more appealing to larger customers." That's a direct quote from the article.

For heaven's sake, that means that the plus-size industry realizes that customers do want plus-size models to be bigger!

In that case, since the industry realizes this, then why don't they use fuller-figured models!?

Instead of taking a smaller model and purportedly making her "appear to be a size 20," (whether through digital manipulation, or worse, through the absolutely contemptible idea of "padding"), why not use a size-20 model!!?

I find that bit of information incredibly revealing. I always doubted that the plus-size industry could be unaware of the fact that the public loves to see fuller-figured plus-size models, true plus-size models, and is annoyed by faux-plus girls modelling plus-size clothing. But now, here's the proof. The public preference for fuller girls is known. They realize it. But they don't do anything about it.

For goodness' sake, why? Why don't they accede to their customers' wishes? The industry has so many absolutely gorgeous models who are well above a size 12. Kelsey Olson (my favorite), Charlotte Coyle, Katherine Roll, Marritt, Justine, Barbara, and many more. Even Kailee is a 14. Look at how much enthusiasm Lindsey's swimwear campaign attracted - because she looked beautiful and plus.

If the straight-size fashion industry has a problem with size, that's no reason for the plus-size industry to have one. The Vogue crowd may not accept true plus-size models, but who cares? Full-figured customers love them (as the industry itself seemingly realizes, according to the article!).

Come on. Forget the digitizing, forget the padding, please just use gorgeous and truly plus-size models. Show what full-figured beauty can be.
M. Lopez is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:25.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.