![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: August 2005
Posts: 580
|
More studies are now confirming what should be obvious to anyone with a little common sense: being full-figured is healthier for women than being emaciated.
The look of a glowing, vibrant curvy woman vs. that of a sunken-cheeked, starving waif is enough to tell the whole story. But because our media has turned this around and propagandized skeletal gauntness as a marker of "health" and a robust, natural figure as the opposite, studies like this seem to be necessary to wake people out of their delusion and return to reality. Here's the link, and the pertinent information. http://www.wftv.com/health/18681655/detail.html Quote:
So in other words, being full-figured actually improves health. Again, that should be obvious, but with media curve-o-phobia, this fact can't be repeated often enough. And the attacks upon this study by its critics are laughable, especially when they claim that it "does not address quality of life." In fact, quality of life is the best argument for being curvy. Which life has the best "quality" - one in which a woman spends years suffering from constant food deprivation, punishing herself in a gym prison, and being continually miserable? Or one in which a woman eats whatever she wants, pleasurably and comfortably, and spends her free time having fun? Both quality and quantity of life improve when a woman embraces her natural inclination to be full-figured. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2008
Posts: 413
|
There's no question about it - fuller-figured is healthier. The film and fashion industries try to gloss-up starving women to make them seem attractive (until the poor girls actually die from anorexia),, but in truth emciated women look sick, and are unhealthy.
One British doctor puts it plainly, and identifies the androgynous agenda that fashion pushes as being part of the cause. http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandst...-vs-superskinny Quote:
Another article is especially devastating because it lists many of the physically destructive effects of diet-starvation: http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/e...86908-20602733/ Quote:
Horrifying, isn't it? As the article asks, "What's the point of spending all your time losing weight just to look terrible?" Yet that's exactly what dieting and exercise-torture accomplish. It's unthinkable that women destroy their looks and their health this way, but that's exactly what the media has brainwashed them into doing. And instead of all this, girls could be comfortably eating whatever they like and leading a relaxed life, and looking younger, with better skin, healthier hair, a fuller bust, and feeling happier. How could anyone not choose this as the better option? Yet tragically, many women don't. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: March 2009
Posts: 12
|
It really is common sense. At times, I see commercials asking for donations for starving people in other countries. These people look emaciated because they can't help it. The economic conditions in their part of the world are terrible. Then we hop over to American television, and our own media is literally selling starvation to women on purpose, calling it "beautiful" and "healthy," and depicting it as the only way they can really be successful. That's just bizarre and infuriating. It's also insulting to intelligence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: February 2009
Posts: 23
|
It is interesting how Baroque paintings showed full-figured goddesses and angels. A hundred years ago a thin woman was a sickly prostitute, but nowadays... oh dear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: July 2005
Posts: 621
|
Slowly, studies are beginning to emerge showing that the whole weight "epidemic" is a colossal myth, and just another example of public hysteria.
The articles are usually suffused with mixed messages, but within them there are important facts. Take this article, for example: http://tinyurl.com/d5p6ok It's not positive, but it includes the following significant points: Quote:
The last paragraph is especially important, and a real advance in medical thinking, since the medical field is nearly as reflexively curve-o-phobic as the mass media. Jettisoning the idea that there is such a thing as being "over"weight would be a major advance. Along with this are growing revelations that the studies which claim that being fuller-figured is somehow less healthy have all been falsified. This is just one example: http://www.boston.com/news/health/b...or_says_he.html Quote:
So because of the researcher's anti-plus prejudice, he falsified data "to make it come out" the way he wanted it- to indicate that being plus-size could be a health issue, when in fact the data showed the opposite. And this is just the rare example of a researcher who got caught. Imagine how many are still falsifying the data to fuel this mythical "epidemic," since, as the previous article observed, there's "a huge amount of money to be made by encouraging hysteria around the issue." The truth is finally coming out- curvier women are healthier and live longer; and what's more, they lead more enjoyable lives. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: July 2005
Posts: 438
|
There are many such studies, but they seldom get reported - and if they do, only in smaller news sources. The mainstream media is only interested in fuelling the fiction of a weight "epidemic" and promoting weight hysteria. It has no interest in the truth - which is that being fuller-figured is healthier for women.
A new Japanese study confirms this: http://www.deseretnews.com/article/...ve-longest.html The article is poorly worded, but the facts are conclusive: Quote:
This is the hidden truth, which the media (duped by rigged studies funded by the diet industry) refuses to acknowledge. The simple fact is that it is natural and healthy for women to be curvier; while when they starve or torture themselves, they ruin their bodies, and their health. Thats why women feel such pleasure from eating, and such discomfort at dieting or exercising. It is Natures way of signalling what the body needs, and what it should avoid. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: July 2005
Posts: 1,733
|
The information in this thread, especially in the articles that M. Lopez and Hannah posted, is absolutely vital. It's a scandal that these facts are suppressed by the mass media, while trumped-up curve-o-phobic propaganda is pumped out on a daily basis. Truth is hidden from public view, while lies are trumpeted ever more loudly. It isn't the first time that such a phenomenon has occurred, but it's appalling to see it happening right before one's eyes. M. Lopez indicates what is perhaps the most astonishing aspect of this whole scenario: Quote:
Think about the sensations that the female body experiences during starvation: utter physical misery, weakness, and, as the Daily Record piece indicated, depression. Those are the hallmarks of illness. Then think about the sensations that women experience when they eat as much as they want: happiness, energy, and pleasure sometimes bordering on ecstasy if the indulgence is especially generous. Those are the feelings of good health. The body is clearly signalling which activity is beneficial, and which is destructive. Likewise, consider the debilitating physical effects of food deprivation, as listed above: haggardness, gauntness, androgyny. By contrast, consider this physical effects of self-indulgence: freshness, softness, womanly curviness, a rosy glow. Weight gain is nothing less than a fountain of youth for women; a natural beauty treatment. Again, the body is clearly indicating which behaviour improves health, and which ruins it. What madness that the media has been able to turn common sense on its head, and pretend that activities like diet-starvation and exercise-torture (which induce every physical indication of illness) are somehow "good," while richer curviness (which induces every physical indication of health) is somehow "bad." Hopefully, the increased visibility of today's plus-size models will prompt women to reconsider this media brainwashing, and to embrace their naturally full-figured selves rather than trying to punish themselves into unnatural forms. Kristina Yeo--new talent at Ford Toronto. Size 16, 38-35-49. ![]() Notice the full waist and soft limbs. To see the industry accepting models with a healthy 49" hip measurement is a definite sign of progress. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|