![]() |
|
|
#1 | |||||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2010
Posts: 186
|
Gradually, more and more research is confirming that the anti-plus propaganda that is being spouted by the medical industry and the media is a hoax, and that in fact, being thin is bad for women's health, while being full-figured is the healthier condition.
A new article from the Daily Mail lays out the most comprehensive case yet for the health detriments of being underweight, and conversely, the health benefits of being full-figured. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/a...o=feeds-newsxml Here are some of the core points: Quote:
It gets better. Not only does the article point out the health hazards of being underweight, but -- and this is truly encouraging to see -- it advises women to gain weight for the sake of their health, and even tells them how to do it. This is an undeniable sign of progress: Quote:
Besides osteoperosis, being less than full-figured also leads to heart disease: Quote:
Furthermore, being full-figured increases a woman's chances of delivering a healthy baby, which thinness jeopardizes: Quote:
Being underweight also leads to lung disease for women: Quote:
Throughout Western history, just as being plus-size was the epitome of female beauty, so was it considered the visual representation of health. The modern age inverted these timeless beliefs. But as in so many things, the traditional belief system turns out to have been the right one. Traditional has been vindicated once again, and modernism debunked. Full-figured women are both more beautiful and healthier than their underweight rivals. Once and for all, let the media myths be shattered and let all plus-size women realize that they are, in fact, both the picture of beauty and the picture of health, precisely because they are curvy and well-fed. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2008
Posts: 410
|
In the midst of the media's non-stop war against full-figured beauty, there are growing signs of a push-back. The above Daily Mail article collects some of the information that is beginning to get through, despite the attempts by the starvation/torture industries to suppress it. Here and there, articles are popping up in which a curvier appearance for women is praised while emaciation is denounced.
The following Times of India article is somewhat light-hearted, but it is part of this percolating underground movement affirming the superiority of traditional, full-figured femininity. http://articles.timesofindia.indiat...lly-curves-envy Some of the choice points: Quote:
No single article will change people's minds, but hundreds of them expressing similar sentiments will slowly but surely deprogram the public from its anti-plus brainwashing. We need serious articles, humorous articles, articles about fashion, articles about the heath benefits of being curvy; everything. Together, they will form a collective discourse that will help people to trust their own instincts and acknowledge their innate preference for curvaceous beauty as true and correct, worthy to be acknowledged and celebrated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: July 2005
Posts: 1,726
|
Quote:
To discover an article that doesn't just decry self-imposed starvation but actively encourages women to indulge and to blossom into a fuller size is extremely encouraging. The fact that weight gain turns out to be demonstrably advantageous to health should surprise no one--or at least, no one who isn't brainwashed by pro-anorexia propaganda. After all, evolution would not have developed in women their passionate craving for food if it weren't a benefit to well being. Natural selection inevitably screens out harmful human tendencies and develops positive reinforcements for beneficial behaviours. (In this way, for example, romantic feelings are pleasurable because they propagate the species. Those individuals who felt such ardour most strongly, throughout history, created the most offspring and passed on this inclination.) Likewise, the anguish that ensues from food deprivation clearly signals the deleterious consequences of this behaviour on women's health. By contrast, the relish and gratification that women experience when they freely indulge themselves betokens the beneficial effects of this practice. Indeed, even the essentially feminine love of pleasure, and women's voluptuous, sensual tendencies as a whole, have evolved to their current intensity owing to how acutely these sensations benefit the species. Nature invites women to be fuller-figured for the benefit of their health and well-being, and has given them pleasurable sensations to accompany the act of indulgence, to reinforce this behaviour. Thus, when women eat what they like and as much as they like, they are simply following constructive evolutionary tendencies. When they starve themselves, on the other hand, they ruin their health, and the body punishes them as a result. The article that Meredith posted itemizes the many reasons why women should listen to their bodies and allow nature to shape their figures into the curvaceous forms it intends. Nevertheless, the very best reason for women to avoid starvation and eat what they like remains the most apparent one: to become more beautiful. Lindsey Garbelman, size 18, looking luscious and healthy modelling Monif C. swimwear on Fox News: ![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|