The Judgment of Paris Forum

Go Back   The Judgment of Paris Forum > 2005-2012 > 2006: January - December
User Name
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 13th October 2006   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: July 2005
Posts: 633
Default ''Haven't you heard? Curves are in''

As a sort of follow-up to the post about Natalie in last week's episode of Ugly Betty, I came across an article that (I hope) indicates growing condemnation of the obscenity of digital curve-diminishment.

Apparently, a minor celebrity named "Brooke Hogan" recently appeared in FHM, and was airbrushed into androgyny. Here's a link to the article

and here's the relevant text:

Haven't you heard? Curves are in

Women should embrace fuller figures; eschew media's unrealistic depictions

Article by: Amber Siwicki

Magazines in this day and age are particularly disheartening to females. These days, not only do we have to compare ourselves to the women who surround us in everyday life, but we must compete with the idea of women we see on the magazine racks - the latter being much more difficult to achieve.

I happened to pick up a copy of the new FHM earlier this week. The cover girl for this month is an aspiring singer, already known to the world for her father's well-established wrestling career: Brooke Hogan, daughter of Hulk Hogan.

However, I can honestly say that I give her credit for pursuing her dreams and making them come true thus far. "Hogan Knows Best" is a hit reality show. Therefore, it is safe to say many people have seen it...

The spread FHM turned out for Brooke is absolutely ridiculous. They airbrushed her pictures so much that she looks to be a mere shadow of her former self. There are currently blogs on the Internet dedicated to talking about how fake her pictures look. One person mentioned that Brooke's pictures look like they just pasted her head onto a runway model's body. Sadly, this is not an exaggeration. They even vertically stretched her face to make it look less full. The Brooke Hogan we are all used to seeing is definitely not visible in these pictures...

So what does this do to the rest of us who are not born with a 23-inch waist? We are made to feel as though we are not pretty enough. We are made to feel like we are simply less attractive than someone who is that thin. It is reinforced in our minds that our "average-sized" bodies are less desirable...

Women are made to feel like they have to keep improving themselves to reach this unattainable body we see time and time again on all the covers of our favorite magazines...Women were not meant to have a single body type. We should be proud of our differences instead of hiding behind computer software to cover them up.

If magazines printed pictures of women that were not so extremely touched up, we would have less to be self-conscious about. We would not have as many reasons to feel so unattractive. We would feel normal.

Brooke Hogan should go back to FHM and redo her photo shoot. She should be proud of her size and shape. Not every woman needs to be a twig to be attractive. That is a stereotype we need to knock out of our heads, ladies.

It's nice to see people speaking out against this ridiculous practice. I hope no plus-size model is ever subjected to this kind of nonsense. The whole point of full-figured modelling is to show off natural, womanly curves.

I was really amused by the cartoon that went with the article:

As you might expect, Brooke Hogan is pretty thin anyway, with only the barest trace of natural curves. What they could ever want to diminish on her is a mystery.

Kaitlynn is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:55.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.