Re: ''Quid est veritas?''


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Judgment of Paris ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Chad on March 07, 2005 at 18:22:57:

In Reply to: Re: ''Quid est veritas?'' posted by Emily on March 07, 2005 at 01:21:06:

The magazines obviously play a role in this. It used to be that full-figured women were altogether invisible in fashion/lifestyle mags, but I don't know how much better things are currently. Whenever you do see someone over a size 10 in a glossy mag, it's usually not a model, but an ordinary reader (someone who is NOT chosen for their appearance). And what's more, they're often in placed in the "fashion don'ts"-sections.

But for the all-out glamour layouts, the high-quality fashion and cosmetics pictorials, those are still the exclusive domain of the waifs.

So the implicit comparison in the casual reader's mind is, "Oh, full-figured women look ordinary, and straight-size models look amazing". And it's only because the circumstances are rigged that way.

I'd like to see how the anorex-chic aesthetic would fare if the roles were reversed - that is, if the fashion/beauty layouts showed the most gorgeous plus-size models (with great MU, hair, photography, etc.). The tables would turn pretty quickly.

Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 
Comments: Optional Link URL : Link Title : Optional Image URL:

If you press "Preview Message," you are taken to a preview screen where your
message is shown to you before allowing you to post it.
Your message is not finalized until you click "Post Message".


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Judgment of Paris ] [ FAQ ]

HWForums.com Message Forums
Copyright © 2001 HighWired Internet Innovations Inc. All rights reserved.